Experimental Tekkit Server

[Tom]

Sev just logged in. He switched off my refinery for me woot.

[Mr. Analog]

The chunks shouldn't get unloaded since they have teleport tethers. Of course that assumes that's bug free

Well I'm just reading in-between what I see on the wiki. The client is only supposed to  load the chunk your in it sounds like it can't handle loading multiple chunks at the same time.

[Tom]

The chunks shouldn't get unloaded since they have teleport tethers. Of course that assumes that's bug free

Well I'm just reading in-between what I see on the wiki. The client is only supposed to  load the chunk your in it sounds like it can't handle loading multiple chunks at the same time.

Hmm. I was under the impression that the chunks are all kept loaded if you use chunk loaders, regardless if you're there or not. But I have no idea.

[Mr. Analog]

The chunks shouldn't get unloaded since they have teleport tethers. Of course that assumes that's bug free

Well I'm just reading in-between what I see on the wiki. The client is only supposed to  load the chunk your in it sounds like it can't handle loading multiple chunks at the same time.

Hmm. I was under the impression that the chunks are all kept loaded if you use chunk loaders, regardless if you're there or not. But I have no idea.

Yes, but it's a mod and there are a lot of others with the exact same issue in both SMP and local (at least on the wiki comments page for that stuff)

[Tom]

Heads up, I'm thinking of adding the Additional BuildCraft Objects mode from: http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/682821-125bc3152214091-additional-buildcraft-objects

Once I do, people will need to download the client side package for BuildCraft 2.2.14.

[Mr. Analog]

Heads up, I'm thinking of adding the Additional BuildCraft Objects mode from: http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/682821-125bc3152214091-additional-buildcraft-objects

Once I do, people will need to download the client side package for BuildCraft 2.2.14.

Other than faster pipes, what are the benefits?

[Tom]

Heads up, I'm thinking of adding the Additional BuildCraft Objects mode from: http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/682821-125bc3152214091-additional-buildcraft-objects

Once I do, people will need to download the client side package for BuildCraft 2.2.14.

Other than faster pipes, what are the benefits?

The valve and liquid balance pipes are particularly interesting to me. I can see the insertion and extraction pipes being useful too. Though maybe a bit of an overlap there with the advanced pipes from the advanced bc pipes mod.

[Mr. Analog]

Heads up, I'm thinking of adding the Additional BuildCraft Objects mode from: http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/682821-125bc3152214091-additional-buildcraft-objects

Once I do, people will need to download the client side package for BuildCraft 2.2.14.

Other than faster pipes, what are the benefits?

The valve and liquid balance pipes are particularly interesting to me. I can see the insertion and extraction pipes being useful too. Though maybe a bit of an overlap there with the advanced pipes from the advanced bc pipes mod.

I guess the one thing I want to make sure of is that there are no incompatibilities that will make life difficult

I plan on building a reactor today

[Tom]

Heads up, I'm thinking of adding the Additional BuildCraft Objects mode from: http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/682821-125bc3152214091-additional-buildcraft-objects

Once I do, people will need to download the client side package for BuildCraft 2.2.14.

Other than faster pipes, what are the benefits?

The valve and liquid balance pipes are particularly interesting to me. I can see the insertion and extraction pipes being useful too. Though maybe a bit of an overlap there with the advanced pipes from the advanced bc pipes mod.

I guess the one thing I want to make sure of is that there are no incompatibilities that will make life difficult

I plan on building a reactor today

I'd have to test it first with a copy of the map, just to make sure. because if any of the id's conflict, I'd have to work around that issue manually. the tekkit/bukkit setup has a way of sorting out conflicting ids, but I'd need to save the id's it did use, just in case I have to upgrade the main server or whatnot, and have to reinstall the plugin. things don't work so well if the id's are wrong

[Mr. Analog]

Ehh, if anyone's gonna be online tonight can you move depleted uranium cells to the box next to my reactor?

Thanks!

[Lazybones]

Ehh, if anyone's gonna be online tonight can you move depleted uranium cells to the box next to my reactor?

Thanks!

Lol that sounds so wrong

[Mr. Analog]

Ehh, if anyone's gonna be online tonight can you move depleted uranium cells to the box next to my reactor?

Thanks!

Lol that sounds so wrong

Note how I didn't ask them to put uranium INTO the reactor

I trust you guys, but I only trust you guys

[Tom]

I logged in to move your uranium cells, but they were already gone

In other news my 63x63 quarry is done...

Most of what you see in those chests were auto mined from the big quarry. The last image is the amount of diamonds that were generated from all of the cobble, sand, gravel, and dirt. Thats a lot of fsckin cobble right there. 26*8192. A lot of cobble.

So yeah, shut down my refinery setup for now, as all it was doing was powering itself it would eventually run dry if I let it, because the engines were powering the water pump which keeps them cool, as well as the refinery turning the oil into gas (both of which take a fair amount of power), so as it ran those things, the engines used more fuel.. which means it had to pump more water and make more fuel... etc.


append: some math: 3328 stacks of junk in that condenser man. I'm glad I didn't bother with chests for that.

[Mr. Analog]

Whoa nice!

[Mr. Analog]

You know what the best thing ever is?

MINING LASER

That is all.