Righteous Wrath Online Community

General => Tech Chat => Topic started by: Mr. Analog on July 28, 2015, 02:59:43 PM

Title: Slashdot for Sale (again)
Post by: Mr. Analog on July 28, 2015, 02:59:43 PM
http://news.slashdot.org/story/15/07/28/1855254/dhi-group-inc-announces-plans-to-sell-slashdot-media

So what could be worse than DICE?

*shudder*

TBH I wish it went back to the geeks from whence it came, or at least go back to not having a corporate overlord dictate stupidity like Slashvertisements.

Make it better or let it die :shrug:
Title: Re: Slashdot for Sale (again)
Post by: Mr. Analog on January 29, 2016, 08:19:43 AM
Say hello to BIZX, LLC

http://meta.slashdot.org/story/16/01/29/0247219/slashdot-and-sourceforge-sold-now-under-new-management

Strangely the new owners are reaching out to the people in the comments, I wonder if they will listen and adapt or just keep directing traffic to clickbait (like DICE did)
Title: Re: Slashdot for Sale (again)
Post by: Mr. Analog on January 29, 2016, 08:41:52 AM
This guy has a sense of humor, I likie
Title: Re: Slashdot for Sale (again)
Post by: Darren Dirt on January 29, 2016, 01:28:24 PM
Quote from: Mr. Analog on January 29, 2016, 08:41:52 AM
This guy has a sense of humor, I likie

Who? http://slashdot.org/~whipslash ?
Title: Re: Slashdot for Sale (again)
Post by: Mr. Analog on January 29, 2016, 01:36:36 PM
Quote from: Darren Dirt on January 29, 2016, 01:28:24 PM
Quote from: Mr. Analog on January 29, 2016, 08:41:52 AM
This guy has a sense of humor, I likie

Who? http://slashdot.org/~whipslash ?

Yup, he introduced himself here:
http://meta.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8680057&cid=51393293

Seems to be aware of what bugs us:
http://meta.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8680057&cid=51393557

...and has a sense of humor:
http://meta.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8680057&cid=51393591
Title: Re: Slashdot for Sale (again)
Post by: Darren Dirt on January 29, 2016, 01:36:45 PM
Always fun discovering new resources by clicking links from Slashdot discussions!

One of them asked about new ownership maybe finally fixing the broken code -- specifically related to UTF-16, which is variable length and therefore some of the 4-byte encodings can break code that expects only 2 bytes, etc.


That discussion got me to this:
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/102205/should-utf-16-be-considered-harmful


which of course links off to something quite practical!
Full table of "visual" Unicode aka Youtube Comments Cheat Sheet ;)
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Unicode/Character_reference/1D000-1DFFF

Title: Re: Slashdot for Sale (again)
Post by: Mr. Analog on January 29, 2016, 01:42:41 PM
The comments have been the real content for a long time now but yeah, some good stuff

haha
Title: Re: Slashdot for Sale (again)
Post by: Darren Dirt on January 29, 2016, 01:43:48 PM
Quote from: Darren Dirt on January 29, 2016, 01:36:45 PM
which of course links off to something quite practical!
Full table of "visual" Unicode aka Youtube Comments Cheat Sheet ;)
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Unicode/Character_reference/1D000-1DFFF

𝗰𝟘𝟘𝗹𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 <-- try searching on this webpage for 0 (zero) or the letter c or l or n or e or s -- in Notepad or even MS Word it is not found (but in modern browsers it seems to "interpret" the non-ASCII chars as their ASCII equivalent, where applicable.)





but re. UTF-16 being "harmful" -- apparently it is pretty recognized as YUP ... heck there's even a website on the subject: http://utf8everywhere.org/
Title: Re: Slashdot for Sale (again)
Post by: Tom on January 29, 2016, 02:51:46 PM
Everyone should just use UCS32. the variable length stuff is a hack >:(