DIY News writes "A Hong Kong man has been convicted of movie internet piracy in what is believed to be the first case involving BitTorrent file-sharing software. The man was found guilty of copyright infringement for distributing three Hollywood blockbusters using BitTorrent."
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/25/1433258
LOL @ "Mr. Cancelled (572486)" (Tuesday October 25, @11:46AM)
Quote
We've all seen enough of these types of stories here on /. to know what to expect in the discussion thread. Allow me to sum up about 75% of the inevitable replies:
-Good! Pirates deserve to be punished for stealing others works
-Pirating is copyright infringement - Not stealing
-I can't believe the hypocrisy of Slashdot readers who find it ok to steal music and movies, but who find infringements from the likes of Sco and Microsoft to be wrong
-It's people like this who are causing movie ticket prices to be so high
-If they'd make better movies, then more people would go to see them in the big theatre, and not prefer to watch them at home
-Why are people who commit copyright infringement given sentences equal to, or often more than those given to violent offenders? One's clearly a crime, while the others merely a misdemeanor
-Come on and get me MPAA/RIAA - I've got the guts to fight you! I'm going to keep sharing stuff just to piss you off. Muwahahahaha
And so on...