Main Menu

Digital Chicanery

Started by Mr. Analog, February 26, 2007, 08:51:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mr. Analog

We all know how much photoshop goes into making magazine images look good, but this page really illustrates it.

http://www.glennferon.com/portfolio1/index.html
By Grabthar's Hammer

Lazybones

Kinda makes you sick when you see enough of these. So many people TRY to look like these images but it is so fake.

Mr. Analog

The best ones are where body parts (or proportions) are changed to inhuman properties.
By Grabthar's Hammer

Lazybones

Ultra thin waists, Bigger boobs n booty, not to mention not a wrinkle in sight.

Mr. Analog

Quote from: Lazybones on February 26, 2007, 09:23:40 PM
Ultra thin waists, Bigger boobs n booty, not to mention not a wrinkle in sight.

The line between reality and artistic interpretation is very fuzzy, that's for sure! And I too think that it's sad that girls (and some guys too) feel like they have to adhere to this kind of standard. They might as well be comparing themselves to Wilma Flintstone or He-Man...

Me, I'm more of a "Comic Book Guy" LOL!

By Grabthar's Hammer

Mags

Quote from: Mr. Analog on February 26, 2007, 10:20:45 PM
Quote from: Lazybones on February 26, 2007, 09:23:40 PM
Ultra thin waists, Bigger boobs n booty, not to mention not a wrinkle in sight.

The line between reality and artistic interpretation is very fuzzy, that's for sure! And I too think that it's sad that girls (and some guys too) feel like they have to adhere to this kind of standard. They might as well be comparing themselves to Wilma Flintstone or He-Man...

Me, I'm more of a "Comic Book Guy" LOL!



Fake. Seen him in real life, and he's totally touched up. Not even close to as handsom as this guy.



:P
"Bleed all over them, let them know you're there!"

Tom

Whats funny is some of the women don't even look like the same person after the "touchups".
<Zapata Prime> I smell Stanley... And he smells good!!!

Mr. Analog

Quote from: Mags on February 26, 2007, 11:11:03 PM
Fake. Seen him in real life, and he's totally touched up. Not even close to as handsom as this guy.



:P

My breakfast burrito is rapidly congealing so I will be blunt; LOL!
By Grabthar's Hammer

Thorin

I think I might actually show #2, #3, and #5 to my kids and point out to them that what they see in magazines shouldn't necessarily be believed as true - a healthy dose of skepticism will do them well in life, methinks.
Prayin' for a 20!

gcc thorin.c -pedantic -o Thorin
compile successful

Lazybones

Quote from: Thorin on February 27, 2007, 10:25:09 AM
I think I might actually show #2, #3, and #5 to my kids and point out to them that what they see in magazines shouldn't necessarily be believed as true - a healthy dose of skepticism will do them well in life, methinks.

You should dig up the stars without makeup images as well. It is even more frightening.

Thorin

Well, I don't want to frighten them, just let them see that those too-perfect-to-be-true images really are not true.  That way, hopefully they don't waste their lives trying to live up to something that's unattainable.
Prayin' for a 20!

gcc thorin.c -pedantic -o Thorin
compile successful

Tom

Except that #5 is a bit frightening.
<Zapata Prime> I smell Stanley... And he smells good!!!

Darren Dirt

related find: a slideshow of a dozen or so celebs with vs. without makeup...

http://www.break.com/index/celebrities_without_makeup.html


As some of the comments said, Mariah doesn't actually look half-bad without, but the others... yikes -- the Helent Hunt "without" photo almost looked like Richard Belzer :o
_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________