Righteous Wrath Online Community

General => Lobby => Video => Topic started by: Darren Dirt on December 17, 2012, 12:33:55 PM

Title: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Darren Dirt on December 17, 2012, 12:33:55 PM
Quote from: Mr. Analog on December 06, 2012, 10:09:23 AM

Quote from: Darren Dirt on December 06, 2012, 09:59:02 AM
speaking of completely-obviously-not-trying-to-be-original cover art...

http://www.slashfilm.com/the-star-trek-into-darkness-teaser-poster-has-arrived/

(http://bitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com/slashfilm/wp/wp-content/images/Star-Trek-Into-Darkness-Teaser-header.jpg)


look familiar?
Spoiler

(http://bitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com/slashfilm/wp/wp-content/images/ZZ5A8DACE8-550x548.jpg)

[close]

Yes I did a double take when I saw it.

Thankfully the trailer actually looks good.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fr3jVk-kL8A

Yeah I just watched the Star Trek Into Darkness trailer right now, imo it's got a vibe of Inception meets what-TerminatorSalvation-shoulda-been.

Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Mr. Analog on December 17, 2012, 01:02:22 PM
It looks really good yeah!
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Darren Dirt on March 21, 2013, 11:42:39 AM
a new "International Trailer" just came out, apparently.

Quote from: http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Star-Trek-Darkness-International-Trailer-Boasts-Jaw-Dropping-Action-36507.html
In this international trailer, Abrams doesn't show his hand, but does show off plenty of jaw-dropping action sequences, spectacular special effects, and welcomed Kirk and Spock banter. It's giving us far more than the teaser unveiled earlier this month, yet leaves us wanting more. Bravo, Abrams. Bravo.


a lot more plot revealed, so semi-spoiler warning for the link above ...

Spoiler


looks like we might have a relatively standard Revenge Flick, folks!

Spoiler


but with LENS FLARES

[close]

[close]
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Mr. Analog on March 21, 2013, 12:03:33 PM
yepp

talk about wasted potential.
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Darren Dirt on March 21, 2013, 12:12:29 PM
Quote from: Mr. Analog on March 21, 2013, 12:03:33 PM
yepp

talk about wasted potential.

and yet, utterly non-shocking. considering*. http://screenrant.com/prometheus-2-damon-lindelof-writer/comment-page-1/#comments

Optimistic Anticipation Level: minimal!







*I mean, how can someone be immersed in a single writing project for a year plus, and have it still turn out so incoherent and convulated? (and not even in a good way!) ... perhaps Lindelof chooses to just "smoke weed all day" just like Wesley Snipes during Blade 3 (http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2012/11/21/patton-oswalt-gets-brutally-honest-about-the-failures-of-blade-trinity)?



Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Tom on March 21, 2013, 12:16:29 PM
(http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s278/itbegins2005/khan.jpg)


(http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/36456910.jpg)
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Mr. Analog on March 21, 2013, 01:38:44 PM
The Root of all Evil is usually Executive Meddling.
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Darren Dirt on March 27, 2013, 01:13:12 PM
Star Trek Video Game PREVIEW - Inside Gaming GDC 2013 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvF0w1GIrW0)
^ tie-in with the reboot franchise*, video was posted 26Mar2013 -- and gameplay has plenty of lens flares! (not joking!)





*but not directly connected to the new film, although the clips show the Chris Pine Kirk, so... ???
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Mr. Analog on March 27, 2013, 01:51:18 PM
I think there is a licensing contract clause that ensures no Star Trek game shall be good.
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Darren Dirt on March 27, 2013, 02:30:20 PM
Quote from: Mr. Analog on March 27, 2013, 01:51:18 PM
I think there is a licensing contract clause that ensures no Star Trek game shall be good.
...which is why in the video I linked they keep saying it's NOT a "licensed" Trek game... but it also kinda is. But not, also.
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Mr. Analog on March 27, 2013, 02:42:21 PM
It either is or isn't *lens flare*
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Darren Dirt on March 27, 2013, 04:36:55 PM
It's licensed because it uses the name and is set in the universe of the new Trek rebooted universe. But it's not licensed to suck like previous licensed titles set in the Trek universe. *lens flare*
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Mr. Analog on March 27, 2013, 04:57:52 PM
"Licensed to Suck" hahaha :D

Worst. Bond. Ever.

*lensflare*
Title: Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer
Post by: Darren Dirt on April 10, 2013, 04:48:56 PM
Quote from: Darren Dirt on December 06, 2012, 09:59:02 AM
speaking of completely-obviously-not-trying-to-be-original cover art...

http://www.slashfilm.com/the-star-trek-into-darkness-teaser-poster-has-arrived/

(http://bitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com/slashfilm/wp/wp-content/images/Star-Trek-Into-Darkness-Teaser-header.jpg)


look familiar?


^ from that angle that particular "future-scifi hero staring at a desolated landscape" shot could just as easily be Tom Cruise!
http://www.digitalspy.ca/movies/review/a471567/oblivion-review-tom-cruise-roams-post-apocalyptic-earth.html

or Matt Damon!
http://www.digitalspy.ca/movies/news/a471561/elysium-trailer-matt-damon-teams-with-district-9s-neill-blomkamp.html

or Will Smith!
http://www.digitalspy.ca/movies/i522166-8/25-biggest-blockbusters-of-2013-after-earth.html

or... "Ender"?
http://www.digitalspy.ca/movies/i522077-9/25-biggest-blockbusters-of-2013-enders-game.html