Star Trek: Into Darkness Trailer

Started by Darren Dirt, December 17, 2012, 12:33:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Darren Dirt

December 17, 2012, 12:33:55 PM Last Edit: December 17, 2012, 01:54:34 PM by Darren Dirt
Quote from: Mr. Analog on December 06, 2012, 10:09:23 AM

Quote from: Darren Dirt on December 06, 2012, 09:59:02 AM
speaking of completely-obviously-not-trying-to-be-original cover art...

http://www.slashfilm.com/the-star-trek-into-darkness-teaser-poster-has-arrived/




look familiar?
Spoiler



[close]

Yes I did a double take when I saw it.

Thankfully the trailer actually looks good.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fr3jVk-kL8A

Yeah I just watched the Star Trek Into Darkness trailer right now, imo it's got a vibe of Inception meets what-TerminatorSalvation-shoulda-been.

_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________

Mr. Analog

#1
December 17, 2012, 01:02:22 PM
It looks really good yeah!
By Grabthar's Hammer

Darren Dirt

#2
March 21, 2013, 11:42:39 AM Last Edit: March 21, 2013, 11:46:31 AM by Darren Dirt
a new "International Trailer" just came out, apparently.

Quote from: http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Star-Trek-Darkness-International-Trailer-Boasts-Jaw-Dropping-Action-36507.html
In this international trailer, Abrams doesn't show his hand, but does show off plenty of jaw-dropping action sequences, spectacular special effects, and welcomed Kirk and Spock banter. It's giving us far more than the teaser unveiled earlier this month, yet leaves us wanting more. Bravo, Abrams. Bravo.


a lot more plot revealed, so semi-spoiler warning for the link above ...

Spoiler


looks like we might have a relatively standard Revenge Flick, folks!

Spoiler


but with LENS FLARES

[close]

[close]
_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________

Mr. Analog

#3
March 21, 2013, 12:03:33 PM
yepp

talk about wasted potential.
By Grabthar's Hammer

Darren Dirt

#4
March 21, 2013, 12:12:29 PM Last Edit: March 21, 2013, 12:16:52 PM by Darren Dirt
Quote from: Mr. Analog on March 21, 2013, 12:03:33 PM
yepp

talk about wasted potential.

and yet, utterly non-shocking. considering*. http://screenrant.com/prometheus-2-damon-lindelof-writer/comment-page-1/#comments

Optimistic Anticipation Level: minimal!







*I mean, how can someone be immersed in a single writing project for a year plus, and have it still turn out so incoherent and convulated? (and not even in a good way!) ... perhaps Lindelof chooses to just "smoke weed all day" just like Wesley Snipes during Blade 3?



_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________

Tom

#5
March 21, 2013, 12:16:29 PM



<Zapata Prime> I smell Stanley... And he smells good!!!

Mr. Analog

#6
March 21, 2013, 01:38:44 PM
The Root of all Evil is usually Executive Meddling.
By Grabthar's Hammer

Darren Dirt

#7
March 27, 2013, 01:13:12 PM Last Edit: March 27, 2013, 01:16:59 PM by Darren Dirt
Star Trek Video Game PREVIEW - Inside Gaming GDC 2013
^ tie-in with the reboot franchise*, video was posted 26Mar2013 -- and gameplay has plenty of lens flares! (not joking!)





*but not directly connected to the new film, although the clips show the Chris Pine Kirk, so... ???
_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________

Mr. Analog

#8
March 27, 2013, 01:51:18 PM
I think there is a licensing contract clause that ensures no Star Trek game shall be good.
By Grabthar's Hammer

Darren Dirt

#9
March 27, 2013, 02:30:20 PM
Quote from: Mr. Analog on March 27, 2013, 01:51:18 PM
I think there is a licensing contract clause that ensures no Star Trek game shall be good.
...which is why in the video I linked they keep saying it's NOT a "licensed" Trek game... but it also kinda is. But not, also.
_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________

Mr. Analog

#10
March 27, 2013, 02:42:21 PM
It either is or isn't *lens flare*
By Grabthar's Hammer

Darren Dirt

#11
March 27, 2013, 04:36:55 PM
It's licensed because it uses the name and is set in the universe of the new Trek rebooted universe. But it's not licensed to suck like previous licensed titles set in the Trek universe. *lens flare*
_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________

Mr. Analog

#12
March 27, 2013, 04:57:52 PM
"Licensed to Suck" hahaha :D

Worst. Bond. Ever.

*lensflare*
By Grabthar's Hammer

Darren Dirt

#13
April 10, 2013, 04:48:56 PM Last Edit: April 10, 2013, 04:53:14 PM by Darren Dirt
_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions