funny take on ship sizes in Star Wars

Started by Thorin, April 26, 2015, 09:32:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Thorin

It's kinda funny to think about what would actually happen on a ship that's 260 kilometers in length...

You have to view the image up close and read the letter sent from its commander to fleet headquarters.



source: http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/1978/4337/original.jpg
Prayin' for a 20!

gcc thorin.c -pedantic -o Thorin
compile successful

Mr. Analog

The toilet paper budget alone for a ship that size...!
By Grabthar's Hammer

Thorin

260km long, if the captain were to tour it bow to stern, that's almost like walking to Calgary.  Sure, they'll have internal transport systems.  Lets say they've made turbolifts that travel at 50km/h.  That'd still be FIVE HOURS to get from the back to the front...
Prayin' for a 20!

gcc thorin.c -pedantic -o Thorin
compile successful

Darren Dirt

Quote from: Thorin on April 27, 2015, 09:57:53 AM
That'd still be FIVE HOURS to get from the back to the front...

"CAPTAIN, TO THE BRIDGE -- STAT!"

...sigh...

_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________

Mr. Analog

President Skroob: The ship is too big. If I walk, the movie will be over.
By Grabthar's Hammer

Tom

It'd be fine if it was startrek. just use point to point transporters :D silly starwars and your antiquated tech.
<Zapata Prime> I smell Stanley... And he smells good!!!

Darren Dirt

#6
Quote from: Tom on April 27, 2015, 03:19:01 PM
It'd be fine if it was startrek. just use point to point transporters :D

More like O_O -- did you forget the transporter death scene in the first ST motion picture? Or McCoy's desire to avoid the bloody things in Next Gen (iirc)? Transporters have a very low fail rate, sure, but it's a non-zero probability, not suitable for multiples-per-day usage imo... unless you get everyone to sign a waiver re. the melting of the body or fryig of the brain of the occasional random victim etc. :eek:

_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________

Tom

Quote from: Darren Dirt on April 27, 2015, 03:33:08 PM
Quote from: Tom on April 27, 2015, 03:19:01 PM
It'd be fine if it was startrek. just use point to point transporters :D

More like O_O -- did you forget the transporter death scene in the first ST motion picture? Or McCoy's desire to avoid the bloody things in Next Gen (iirc)? Transporters have a very low fail rate, sure, but it's a non-zero probability, not suitable for multiples-per-day usage imo. :eek:


Sure, it happens. More people die in car crashes and slipping in the shower though.
<Zapata Prime> I smell Stanley... And he smells good!!!

Darren Dirt

#8
Quote from: Tom on April 27, 2015, 03:19:01 PM
It'd be fine if it was startrek. just use point to point transporters :D

More like O_O -- did you forget the transporter death scene in the first ST motion picture? Or McCoy's desire to avoid the bloody things in Next Gen (iirc)? Transporters have a very low fail rate, sure, but it's a non-zero probability, not suitable for multiples-per-day usage imo... unless you get everyone to sign a waiver re. the melting of the body or fryig of the brain of the occasional random victim etc. :eek:


BTW SpaceBalls the animated series (all 13 eps, apparently) can be found @ http://www.dailymotion.com/user/kingofcommons (ep 1 = http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xretub_spaceballs-the-animated-series-s01e01-revenge-of-the-sithee_shortfilms )
_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________