developers: "Beware of Methodologies"

Started by Darren Dirt, March 03, 2009, 10:45:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Darren Dirt

http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000024.html

good analogies, thought-provoking as usual for Mr. Spolsky.




also good: "the longer it takes to task switch, the bigger the penalty you pay for multitasking ... [for] *programmers* task switches take a really, really, really long time" (wow does this hit home right now, for me at work presently)
_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________

Thorin

Yeah, Joel's always a good read.  My current team lead has read pretty much every article by Spolsky, and has even done the Joel Test to see how our organization rates (we only got 50%).
Prayin' for a 20!

gcc thorin.c -pedantic -o Thorin
compile successful

Darren Dirt

Quote from: Thorin on March 03, 2009, 11:10:02 PM
Yeah, Joel's always a good read.  My current team lead has read pretty much every article by Spolsky, and has even done the Joel Test to see how our organization rates (we only got 50%).

You mean 6? Ouch.


Oh, and #8 "Do programmers have quiet working conditions?", that should really be understood as more than just reduced noise, but also include reduced INTERUPTIONS -- including frequent last-minute short-deadline urgent tasks, and ongoing multi-tasking expectation (in direct conflict with the other Joel article I read earlier today... grrr...)

_____________________

Strive for progress. Not perfection.
_____________________

Thorin

Yeah, we failed on 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12.  Although 11 we only failed on because writing code during the interview isn't a policy, but almost everyone on the team now had worked previously with the owner or the team lead, so their coding skills were already known.

Still, it was interesting to see a supervisor care enough to take the Joel Test.
Prayin' for a 20!

gcc thorin.c -pedantic -o Thorin
compile successful