Panasonic Glassless 3D 103" TV

[Melbosa]

http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/News/Latest+News/Panasonic+Showcases+New+Vision+at+IFA+2012+/Panasonic+Presents+the+World's+Largest+Glasses-Free+3D+Plasma+Display+at+IFA+2012/10412338/index.html

...

Outline of the New Systems

1. Interactive Multi-view 3D System:

The Interactive Multi-view 3D System optimally utilizes the special characteristics of 3D to richly express the texture of the object., The user can control the image of an object taken from multiple angles through a touch panel, giving the user the freedom to view the object at the angle and size they desire in full HD 3D. The 3D system is able to display the shape and depth of the 3D image accurately regardless of the magnification ratio and display high resolution images at high speeds. The active-shutter type display is able to accurately express the color and texture of objects.

Examples of Applications:
? As an archive for art galleries and museums, or as a virtual gallery
? As a high quality catalogue for auctions or net shopping services
? As a healthcare education system which can display 3D images of the anatomy of the body.

2. World?s Largest Glasses-free 3D Plasma Display:

The display offers impressive 3D images on a 103-inch glasses-free plasma display, the largest in the world. It can display images at a higher resolution and a higher quality than current parallax barrier type glasses-free 3D displays. Through the use of 4K2K plasma panels, it is possible to display high definition 3D images at a resolution equivalent to HD, and by utilizing a newly developed barrier, moir? interference and crosstalk has been reduced by about half of that of previous glasses-free 3D systems.

Examples of Applications:
? For 3D digital signage where the use of 3D glasses is impractical
? As a highly immersive 3D showroom for cars or interior design.

...

[Thorin]

No pictures and lots of marketingspeak.  But damn, that's a big display!

[Mr. Analog]

LOL that was the first thing I thought myself, where are the photos?

I guess it hasn't technically been shown yet, so there are a lack of photos at the moment...

http://panasonic.co.jp/corp/news/official.data/data.dir/2012/08/en120830-5/en120830-5.html

[Darren Dirt]

http://www.google.ca/search?q=Panasonic+Glassless+3D+103%22+TV&tbm=isch

Dinosaur image came from these 2 articles:

http://www.fareastgizmos.com/3d/panasonic-to-exhibit-worlds-largest-glasses-free-3d-plasma-display-at-ifa-2012.php

http://www.toppopular.com/panasonic-unveil-worlds-largest-glasses-free-3d-plasma-tv/


if that helps.

[Tom]

A picture really cant do a 3D tv of any kind justice.

[Mr. Analog]

A picture really cant do a 3D tv of any kind justice.

I disagree!

[Darren Dirt]

HORY CLAP!

[Mr. Analog]

:B hehe that was my reaction too when I first saw it

[Tom]

That's hilarious. But I don't see what that does to prove your point, or disprove mine

[Mr. Analog]

That's hilarious. But I don't see what that does to prove your point, or disprove mine

At the very least we could get a chance to see the form factor of this beast, something.

[Tom]

That's hilarious. But I don't see what that does to prove your point, or disprove mine

At the very least we could get a chance to see the form factor of this beast, something.

Ah true. I meant the TV's picture itself. Sure you can get a picture of the device, but its just another large tv. The important part is how good the picture is, and if it gives you a headache to watch the 3D.

[Mr. Analog]

That's hilarious. But I don't see what that does to prove your point, or disprove mine

At the very least we could get a chance to see the form factor of this beast, something.

Ah true. I meant the TV's picture itself. Sure you can get a picture of the device, but its just another large tv. The important part is how good the picture is, and if it gives you a headache to watch the 3D.

Well, also I think it's important if it functions in 2D as well

[Tom]

That's hilarious. But I don't see what that does to prove your point, or disprove mine

At the very least we could get a chance to see the form factor of this beast, something.

Ah true. I meant the TV's picture itself. Sure you can get a picture of the device, but its just another large tv. The important part is how good the picture is, and if it gives you a headache to watch the 3D.

Well, also I think it's important if it functions in 2D as well

Indeed. But its kinda hard to get that wrong these days with such a high end TV. If people spent 20k or more on a new tv, they want it to not suck.

[Mr. Analog]

That's hilarious. But I don't see what that does to prove your point, or disprove mine

At the very least we could get a chance to see the form factor of this beast, something.

Ah true. I meant the TV's picture itself. Sure you can get a picture of the device, but its just another large tv. The important part is how good the picture is, and if it gives you a headache to watch the 3D.

Well, also I think it's important if it functions in 2D as well

Indeed. But its kinda hard to get that wrong these days with such a high end TV. If people spent 20k or more on a new tv, they want it to not suck.

I agree sadly you can walk into Visions and see pricey sets that look like butt

[Tom]

That's hilarious. But I don't see what that does to prove your point, or disprove mine

At the very least we could get a chance to see the form factor of this beast, something.

Ah true. I meant the TV's picture itself. Sure you can get a picture of the device, but its just another large tv. The important part is how good the picture is, and if it gives you a headache to watch the 3D.

Well, also I think it's important if it functions in 2D as well

Indeed. But its kinda hard to get that wrong these days with such a high end TV. If people spent 20k or more on a new tv, they want it to not suck.

I agree sadly you can walk into Visions and see pricey sets that look like butt

I think most times the reason is because the TVs werent calibrated, and were sourced from like analog OTA signals. Or something equally bad.